CaseStudies.Chat
← Back to the archive
change.archi2019–2026 · strategy

Kodak paid off $400M and bet on film's comeback — the stock doubled in a year

Jim Continenza rebuilt Kodak around its roots — film, print, advanced materials — cut interest costs by $40M a year and left a going-concern warning behind.

What was changed

On Jim Continenza's first day as Eastman Kodak's executive chairman in 2019, director Christopher Nolan called: the company was about to shut the acetate factory that makes a key ingredient of film. 'Do not turn this off,' Continenza recalls him urging. The self-described turnaround specialist took the look — and decided film, Kodak's roots, could be one of its biggest strengths. Roughly seven years later, multiple 2026 Oscar-winning movies, including 'One Battle After Another' and 'Sinners', were shot on Kodak film, part of a resurgence fueled by Hollywood nostalgia and younger consumers.

The base was rotten. Kodak went into bankruptcy in 2012 after missing digital photography's turn, re-emerged a year later focused on commercial printing, and watched its stock hit an all-time low of $1.55 in March 2020. In August 2025 it warned that its finances raised 'substantial doubt about Kodak's ability to continue as a going concern' — about $155 million of cash against nearly $600 million of loans, after a 12% drop in quarterly gross profit. Continenza called it a timing crunch to be fixed partly by terminating the pension plan, and bought stock himself.

The playbook since 2019: change about 90% of the leadership, pay off more than $400 million of debt, refinance three times, and refocused on print plus advanced materials and chemicals while investing in film capacity. By early 2026 the numbers turned: fourth-quarter gross profit of $67 million, up 31% year on year, annual interest expense reduced by roughly $40 million, and a stock up nearly 100% over the past year. 'We're a billion-dollar global company, but one thing we have going for us is our brand recognition,' Continenza says — run 'as a startup' now that only Kodak could 'screw it up.'

Why it worked

The acetate-factory call forced a re-read of the assets: film demand from A-list directors and Gen Z was real, so capacity became a moat instead of scrap.

Debt came first — more than $400M paid down and three refinancings cut interest by about $40M a year, buying time for the operating plan.

Replacing about 90% of leadership broke the printing-era inertia that had missed digital photography decades earlier.

Buying stock after the going-concern disclosure put his own money behind the claim that it was a GAAP timing issue, not a death sentence.

What can be applied

When a 130-year-old company is collapsing, the fastest way back can be the heritage everyone assumed was dead — if a long-term owner can hold through the going-concern headlines.

Aftermath

Kodak is a stable billion-dollar company rather than a growth rocket; Continenza shrugs at the share price ('it's not supposed to spike, it's supposed to crawl') and defines success as continued financial improvement plus a solid succession plan. The going-concern language of August 2025 gave way within months to a 31% gross-profit jump, and Oscar winners shot on Kodak stock have made film the brand's loudest proof of life.

Sources

  1. How Kodak is trying to turn around its business after teetering on bankruptcy ↗