What was changed
In late 2014 Kering removed Gucci CEO Patrizio di Marco and said creative director Frida Giannini would also leave. Rather than recruit a celebrity designer, new CEO Marco Bizzarri chose Alessandro Michele, a long-time Gucci insider, and gave him total creative responsibility for collections and brand image.
The hard part was not the appointment alone. Gucci had to move a global luxury house away from polished minimalism into a more ornate, gender-fluid identity without losing its existing customers. Kering's announcement stressed that Bizzarri and Michele were aligned on a new contemporary vision.
The result showed up quickly. Kering's 2015 results were only solid, with group revenue up 4.6% comparable. By 2017, Kering called the year historic and said Gucci's comparable growth reached 44.6%, making the brand the engine of the group's record performance.
What it achieved
Kering said Gucci grew 44.6% on a comparable basis in 2017, powering a record year for the group.
Why it worked
Bizzarri gave Michele control over both collections and image, so the new identity was coherent across runway, stores, and communication.
Choosing an insider made the change faster: Michele knew Gucci's teams and archives but was not tied to the outgoing formula.
The decision treated desirability as the bottleneck, not just cost or distribution.
What can be applied
A heritage brand can reset faster by giving one leader authority over product, image, and tempo, instead of treating creative change as styling.
Aftermath
Michele's Gucci became one of luxury's defining growth stories of the late 2010s. Kering later faced the harder task of refreshing Gucci again, but the 2015 reset proved that a mature house could produce startup-like growth when creative authority and business leadership moved together.
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE