What was changed
Hewlett-Packard had spent years cutting costs and repairing its balance sheet after strategic missteps. By 2014, the board chose separation: one company for enterprise infrastructure, software and services, and one for PCs and printing.
The decision matched a split thesis long favored by investors such as Ralph Whitworth of Relational Investors, a former HP chairman. Whitworth publicly called the move value-enhancing and well timed in the turnaround.
The split created HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Meg Whitman led HPE, while Dion Weisler led HP Inc., giving each business its own capital structure, leadership and investor base.
What it achieved
Shareholders received stakes in two public companies: HP Inc. for PCs and printers, and HPE for enterprise infrastructure and services.
Why it worked
The enterprise and PC-printer businesses faced different markets and needed different capital allocation.
The board waited until the turnaround had made both halves financeable.
Activist support helped frame the split as value creation rather than retreat.
What can be applied
A breakup is more credible after the hard stabilization work; otherwise separation just creates two weak companies instead of one.
Aftermath
The separation was completed in 2015. HP Inc. kept the printing and personal systems franchise, while HPE continued pruning enterprise assets and repositioning around infrastructure, cloud and services.
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE